Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why 196 is not a palindrome?

palindrome
0
Posted

Why 196 is not a palindrome?

0

It would be palindromic if it was 191, or 696. Palindromes refer to numbers, words, or phrases that can be read the same both ways. In this case, 196 read backwards would be 691, thus being different to 169. Therefore, 196 is not a palindrome.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123