Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Who Will Carry the Torch for a Willamette Shoreline Trail?

0
Posted

Who Will Carry the Torch for a Willamette Shoreline Trail?

0

As the Willamette Shoreline Transit/Trail analysis proceeds to a Locally Preferred Alignment decision in September, it’s becoming evident that the trail component is going to be a challenge. There simply is not enough width in the right of way in some spots (tunnel, trestle, etc.) to accommodate both rail and trail. The work-arounds to this are very expensive (initial estimate on the order of $60M). While some might argue to use the right-of-way for a trail and punt on transit (e.g., just improve bus service on 43), that’s not likely to be the outcome for a few good reasons: • Portions of the right-of-way are not owned outright, they are easements that may lapse if rail service is not maintained. • The right-of-way is valuable, it’s potentially worth $50-75M as match for Federal funds for a transit project (there are no equivalent programs for trail projects). • Bus solutions in Highway 43 are going to get caught in congested traffic as the corridor sees growth in traffic over the comi

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123