Who should manage the Peer Review process?
• There is a lot of work involved in administering a successful Peer Review process. Chris Foe will provide the Technical Committee with information on how they accomplished their work and the tasks that were involved. • We should budget around $40,000 for the whole project which includes administrative costs, honorariums, travel etc for both the initial and follow up meetings and work. (This money was not in the original budget but can come from the administrative savings that occur because DWR will be the contract manager.) • Once the job description is clarified with the help of the RWQCB staff, we will put out a proposal for work to the Muir Institute, collaborating agencies and other possible candidates. (Note: Please let the If any organization would like to do this as an in-kind contribution. Hopefully someone will rise up to be responsible for this effort. This issue will be on an upcoming Technical Committee meeting agenda. Note: Paul Marshall will check to see if CalFed could
Related Questions
- Well, how about in terms of the process you described earlier of an idea trying to get started? Can peer review serve to stultify that starting of a new theory in the professional community?
- Did the GEO-4 report undergo a peer review process? How were comments from reviewers addressed in the drafting of the GEO-4?
- How does the peer review process work?
