Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Who said XML was inflexible?

inflexible said XML
0
Posted

Who said XML was inflexible?

0

And I responded… No, XML is totally flexible. It’s the XML culture, as I perceive it, that’s inflexibile. The message I hear, over and over, is that they have expectations for what will show up when and from whom, and if you aren’t one of those people, shipping what they expect, then you must be screwing up. Out come the fire hoses, trying to put us out. Hmmm. Luckily the world is bigger. About DOM-like and SAX-like interfaces to XML trees living in Frontier.root, right on. Frontier is a work in progress. Show us how to do it, gently, and we’ll get there soooooner. And, get this, you probably don’t even need UserLand to do it. Brian and others are active in this area, and like the people who do JavaScript and Java parsers, they have more braincells to devote to the problem than my overworked staff does. I said somewhere on our site that we’ve implemented enough XML support in the Frontier kernel to support the interapplication wires we’re working on. It works great. We do validation

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123