Who else besides Mexico has confirmed their involvement to act on the illegal immigration?”
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder questioned the constitutionality of Arizona’s new immigration law — before admitting he hadn’t read it. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just confirmed that the feds plan to sue to stop the law. And Mexico, whose president said Arizona’s law “opens a Pandora’s box of the worst abuses in the history of humanity,” recently filed a brief in U.S. federal court to side with the law’s opponents. Is Arizona’s law, scheduled to go into effect next month, an unconstitutional assault on all things moral and decent? How else to describe the over-the-top reaction to — and the often completely false description of — the law by people who apparently neither read nor understood it? A New York Times sports writer, for example, said, “The law makes the failure to carry immigration documents a crime and directs the police to question people about their immigration status and demand to see their documents if there is reason to suspect they are illegal.” Federal law
Creators Syndicate – U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder questioned the constitutionality of Arizona’s new immigration law — before admitting he hadn’t read it. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just confirmed that the feds plan to sue to stop the law. And Mexico, whose president said Arizona’s law “opens a Pandora’s box of the worst abuses in the history of humanity,” recently filed a brief in U.S. federal court to side with the law’s opponents. A New York Times sports writer, for example, said, “The law makes the failure to carry immigration documents a crime and directs the police to question people about their immigration status and demand to see their documents if there is reason to suspect they are illegal.” Federal law already requires that noncitizens carry documents to prove that they are in the country legally. Arizona makes failure to do so a state crime.
