Who defines “the problems” and declares them “corrected”?
The Justice Department discovered the problems during a routine review of NSA wiretapping. It says the problems have been corrected. – Associated Press http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090416/ap_on_go_co/domestic_spying_4 Would those “corrected” problems be the same uncorrected problems that American citizen Brandon Mayfield has been trying to correct in court for five years now, with regard to information “derived” from perjury-approaching FISA Court-authorized covert searches and surveillance of his home and law office? Covert searches and surveillance in which the tainted FISA “take” is considered spying by the Executive Branch, but “derivative” materials from that take are not? [http://letters.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/06/obama/permalink/ff58e66c7288632a220c2b04f58ef144.html and http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000002747] The abusive investigative failures and deceit by the government in the 2004 Mayfield investigation – in both its application for a
