Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Who Benefits From Nonpartisan Elections?

0
Posted

Who Benefits From Nonpartisan Elections?

0

James Vesely, editorial page editor of the Seattle Times, wants to limit the influence of parties in elections. One way to get partisan politics out of public office is to force more candidates to run without party label. The idea of nonpartisan elections makes more and more sense, especially in the public-works areas of government — those places where management of the office is more important than setting policy. Vesely thinks there are many such places, but none of his examples seem to qualify. (If a position is truly a management position, rather than a policy position, then the holder should be appointed, rather than elected.) I am not wholly opposed to nonpartisan elections. They often make sense when the electorates are small. But they have one great disadvantage, well known to most political scientists, and unknown to almost all editors (or perhaps ignored by them). When electorates are large, political parties counterbalance the influence of the prominent — such as newspaper e

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123