Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Which works better, E.D.T.A. chelation therapy or nutritional arterial cleansing?

0
Posted

Which works better, E.D.T.A. chelation therapy or nutritional arterial cleansing?

0

Both are effective at removing arterial plaque. Some people respond better to one method than the other. Neither is clearly superior to the other. Only the nutritional method, however, can actually prevent the plaque from returning by continually supporting the body’s own immune processes. Some advocates of intravenous chelation, however, do not have much confidence in the nutritional approach. That may be because they have no experience with it, or perhaps because they have noticed disappointing results from taking inferior nutritional formulas that were incapable of living up to the claims made for them. If you have both the resources and the opportunity, by all means, try both approaches and judge for yourself. It is much easier to be objective about an issue if you have lived both sides if it.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123