Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Which training was harder, Sandhurst or the subsequent bomb disposal training?

0
Posted

Which training was harder, Sandhurst or the subsequent bomb disposal training?

0

Sandhurst training is very physical. It’s intellectually demanding as well, but big emphasis on the physical side of things. Lots and lots of living out in the field, lots and lots of speed marches and runs and physical exercise. They try to put the pressure on you. It’s very difficult to simulate the pressures of combat unless you physically practice combat. You can’t do that in a training environment because it’s far too dangerous, and people would obviously get killed. So the way they simulate the pressures of that, in order to test someone’s leadership ability, are to deprive them of sleep, make sure they’re exhausted. That’s when you see the true caliber of a person. So they do so much physical exercise and so much… not sleep deprivation, as in standing on your tiptoes with water dripping in the background and that sort of stuff. But physically, you’re constantly on-the-go all day long. And when you’re not on military exercise or military maneuvers, you’re learning how to shine

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123