Which set of facts fits the multiple IP address scenario better? What is the simpler resolution?
Scneario 1: Someone posts from his computer in Connecticut (or at least, outside of Florida) on 3 separate days spread out over 7 months from 11/29/06 to 6/12/07. He then drives down from Connecticut, posts on 8th Civic with his computer connected to AJP’s wireless network and the South Florida hotel’s network (two IP addresses located near each other). Scenario 2: An AJP employee posts 4 times spread out over 7 months from 11/29/06 to 6/12/07. He then posts two months later to boost AJP’s sagging reputation. It is shown that his August 2007 posts are located in South Florida, both at AJP and near AJP. However, it is *not* known or revealed where his first four posts were made. If he were an AJP employee, then the only consistent conclusion would be that the first four posts would also have South FL IP addresses. If not, then the AJP employee would have to be in the location where those IP addresses are (like Connecticut). Webby never gave Tim/Snowbird a chance to respond. Tim could ha
