Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Which renewable energy sources would not cause pollution and which source would cause pollution for exam?

0
Posted

Which renewable energy sources would not cause pollution and which source would cause pollution for exam?

0

Basically, for the purposes of an exam it comes down to the following: 1) Energy sources which convert one form of energy into Electricity generally don’t pollute – I.e. wind power (Kinetic Energy), Solar (visible wavelength energy), Tide turbines (another type of Kinetic Energy), etc. 2) Energy sources which conver matter into energy either chemically or via nuclear methods have residue which is considered to be pollution. Ie. you can burn wood, or garbage to create heat to boil water to spin a turbine and you still end up with smoke and ash. Two exceptions – nuclear fusion which combines deuterium (heavy hydrogen) where the result is a huge amount of energy and water. You can then make more deuterium out of the water. However, at the moment it isn’t a net plus system (making the fuel takes more energy than fusing it) so it isn’t practical. The other is burning Hydrogen which when done in presence of Oxygen leaves water. Again making hydrogen takes to much energy and it is extremely h

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123