Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Which procedure is “better”: An ISO forms support application or an application to the home Court?

0
Posted

Which procedure is “better”: An ISO forms support application or an application to the home Court?

0

It depends. Each procedure has its own advantages and disadvantages. An ISO forms application is more accessible in the sense that a person can complete the forms on their own or with help. The other party does not have to be served and there is usually no filing fee. The application will be reviewed for completeness by the designated authority in the home province or territory and will usually be sent to the respondent’s jurisdiction within a couple of weeks of it being submitted. When a support order is made in another province or territory, the ISO Act of that province enables the judge to make a retroactive order, so there is specific statutory authority in the common law provinces and territories for retroactive orders with an ISO application. However, once the application is sent to the other jurisdiction, it is completely up to that jurisdiction to process it. The time it takes to complete the process varies from one province to another. In some cases, it can take several months

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123