Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Which of the following statements provide a valid reason NOT to use RTTI for distributed (i.e. networked between different platforms) applications in C++?

April 26, 2017different distributed networked rtti statements valid

0

10 Posted

Which of the following statements provide a valid reason NOT to use RTTI for distributed (i.e. networked between different platforms) applications in C++?

1 Answer

0

10 Posted

A. RTTI is too slow. B. RTTI does not have standardized run-time behavior. C. RTTI uses too much memory. D. RTTI’s performance is unpredictable/non-deterministic. E. RTTI frequently fails to function correctly at run-time 11. A C++ developer wants to handle a static_cast () operation for the class String shown below. Which of the following options are valid declarations that will accomplish this task? class String { public: //… //declaration goes here }; A. char* operator char*(); B. operator char*(); C. char* operator(); D. String operator char*(); E. char* operator String(); 16. When a Copy Constructor is not written for a class the C++ compiler generates one. Which of the following statements correctly describe the actions of this compiler-generated Copy Constructor when invoked? A. The compiler-generated Copy Constructor makes the object being constructed a reference to the object passed to it as an argument. B. The compiler-generated Copy Constructor does not do anything