Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Which method, gravimetric analysis or volumetric analysis is more reliable and why?

0
Posted

Which method, gravimetric analysis or volumetric analysis is more reliable and why?

0

The previous responder brings up excellent points, particularly about the method relying on how good the analyst is. This is highly true! However I would add, that gravimetric methods are typically more ACCURATE for the following reasons: 1. Errors associated with volume measurement (loss in transfer, parallax, spillage, over-titration, etc.) are reduced in gravimetric measurements. In most gravimetric measurements, you WEIGH a final product, which either IS the compound of interest, or is stoichiometrically related to it. 2. Gravimetric methods are less sensitive to temperature than volumetric methods. 3. While BOTH types of methods are subject to sample loss, gravimetic methods are less so. (Note: This is less true if the analyst is a clutz. Goes very well with the previous poster’s comment!) 4. A mass is easier to reproducibly determine than a concentration. (Any day of the week!) 5. A mass is easier to STANDARDIZE than a concentration. Again there are errors associated with both, w

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123