Which computer processor is better AMD or Intel?
Does a larger promotion budget and more recognizable name mean Intel has the better processor? Not necessarily. AMD has long since overcome its “low priced spread” reputation with the first releases of its dual core processors in 2004 and 2005. At that time, independent Cnet laboratory testing found AMD dual cores all had higher performance than Intel.
Over the last five years, Intel and AMD have both improved the quality of the processors, moving in the direction of “muscled silicon.” Both companies offer quad-core processors and six-core processors. The latter originally for server technology are now available in desktop computers. Multi-core processors allow the computer to operate as if it were two, four, or six separate computers. AMD broke into the 64-bit market first, and now Intel is there as well.
In talking with Data Doctors, a Phoenix, Arizona-based custom computer builder and repair center, determining which is the best processor depends on the primary use of the computer, the amount of memory, and the operating system. A graphic designer creates different processor demands than a gamer, who is different from an office system user.
PCStats published a comparison in 2008 calling AMD the best choice for the budget-conscious PC buyer. AMD’s Phenom processor provides more power for the cost. Intel’s processors are better for high end systems and network servers. In 2010, AMD hit par with Intel offering a server processor that offers similar performance for less cost. AMD versus Intel? For high end, heavy duty systems, Intel is the workhorse standard. For light, nimble, and economical machines, the word is AMD.
Both are good, but have specialties in certain areas. Intel has more raw power, and also tends to do pretty well on multimedia processing. In a laptop with an actual add-on graphics setup, rather than an integrated graphics setup, Intel is your better choice. Be aware, however, that they tend to be more expensive. AMD mobile CPUs are a little down on raw power and speed, and so aren’t so good at the multimedia manipulation work, but catch up quite a bit in graphics – they’re still not as fast as Intel, but they are corespondingly cheaper. Where AMD shines is the platform – their integrated graphics chipsets are up to 3x better than Intel’s, so an AMD laptop with integrated graphics will outperform an Intel laptop with integrated graphics at any task where graphics is the key to performance (such as games). Still not as fast as a dedicated card, but good.
