Which are the main advantages of using EasySetUp instead of IPM Motion Studio for applications where motion programming is done via the TML_LIB motion library?
EasySetUp is simpler, allowing a faster setup of the drives/motors using only 2 dialogues In EasySetUp, the setup information is stored in dedicated area of the drive/motor EEPROM from where it is automatically loaded at power on. In IPM Motion Studio the setup information is included in a TML program, which needs to be downloaded and then executed automatically at power on with drive/motor set in AUTORAN mode. In EasySetUp you can read the setup information stored in a drive/motor and based on it to have a complete restore of the context as it was when the setup data was saved in drive/motor. IPM Motion Studio does not support this option EasySetUp generates automatically the initialization files to be included in an application using TML_LIB EasySeyUp offers the possibility to include in the setup data, the axis ID, the serial baud rate and CANbus baud rate to start with at power on. When EasySetUp is launched it identifies automatically, the axis ID of drive/motor connected via RS-2
Related Questions
- Which are the main advantages of using EasyMotion Studio instead of IPM Motion Studio for applications where motion programming is partially or integrally done using Technosoft Motion Language?
- Which are the main advantages of using EasySetUp instead of IPM Motion Studio for applications where motion programming is done via the TML_LIB motion library?
- I have updated my drive/motor firmware to revision i using EasySetUp firmware programmer. May I continue using IPM Motion Studio?
