Whether an extract given under section 12 will have the same evidentiary value as an extract given under section 17 under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
A certified extract under section 17 of the RBD Act, 1969 is intended for use for the purposes of legal dispute or judicial proceeding. In any such case, a document certified in the manner provided in section 76 is admissible in evidence under section 77 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, as “proof of the contents of the public documents or parts of the public documents of which they purport to be copies”. Under section 76 of the Evidence Act any such copy of public document will bear a certificate written at the foot of such copy that it is a true copy of such document or part thereof, as the case may be, and every such certificate shall be dated and subscribed by such officer with his name and his official title shall be sealed whenever such officer is authorized by law to make use of a seal. As against the above, an extract of the prescribed particulars from the register of births and deaths given under section 12 of the RBD Act, 1969 is intended mainly for purposes of record and may
Related Questions
- Will American Indian Vocational Rehabilitation programs authorized under Section 121 of the Rehabilitation Act have the ability to get reimbursement under the Cost Reimbursement program?
- Whether an extract given under section 12 will have the same evidentiary value as an extract given under section 17 under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
- Can an Indian company registered under section 25 of the Companies Act 1956 have activities outside India ?
