Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Wheres the “Male” Tank Version of the Bv206S Ridgway or M113 “Mini-Gavin”?

m113 Male ridgway tank version
0
0 Posted

Wheres the “Male” Tank Version of the Bv206S Ridgway or M113 “Mini-Gavin”?

0
0

Assuming we can overcome CTM and get the 101st’s infantry air-mechanized with Bv206S Ridgways or M113 Mini-Gavins with fold-down gunshields and firing ports we now have part of a 3D “thunder run” force that can spray small-arms fire in all directions. What’s missing is the shoot-on-the-move, tank meeting engagement killer and building/bunker blaster–the fatal flaw that doomed the 9th HTTB division in the 1980s/90s. The M8 Buford/Thunderbolt has a stabilized gun with a recoiling mass to achieve 4km+, shoot-on-move accuracy and range with 105mm to 120mm high explosive and armor piercing firepower. The weight of this in a turret is around 5 tons–far too much weight for integration on the as-is Bv206S Ridgway even if it could fit into a CH-47D/F. Cutting the Bv206S infantry carrying volume off to just chassis and mounting an exposed gun has been done before—it was the M56 Scorpion with a 90mm gun and shield that nobody liked because Soldiers could be easily killed by enemy bullets and

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123