Where was E. Howard Hunt in November 22, 1963?
Lane’s first tactic to convict Hunt is to claim that the latter had no alibi for November 22, 1963. Of course, Lane has to admit that Hunt’s fellow CIA employees said he was in Washington, DC., but he strongly implies that they must have been lying. First, Lane discusses one Walter Kuzmuk. Kuzmuk was a CIA officer who had worked with Hunt. To the jurors at the first trial, his testimony may have seemed dispositive of the question of Hunt’s whereabouts on November 22, 1963; an experienced, ranking officer of the CIA had seen him in Washington just as the president was being shot in Dallas. According to Kuzmuk, Hunt and his wife had driven by in the early afternoon of November 22 as he exited from a downtown Washington restaurant. if( bInlineFloats ) { document.write( ” ); document.write( WPEndnote1 ); document.write( ‘ Close’ ); document.write( ” ); } Kuzmuk repeated this testimony at the second trial. Since Kuzmuk worked for the CIA, Lane can assume that conspiracy-oriented readers w
