Where is Tibet standing in the foreign policies of countries such as the US, the EU and India?
This is very complicated because this so-called power politics — I call it power friction — had a triangle friction. There is the US and the West, including Japan, there is the Soviet Union, and there is China. So there was triangle friction in the last so many years. But then something happened in this friction. The Russians became a bit weaker. This restriction will continue because there are different ways of thinking. The West is hoping that China will have a democratic form of government and rule of law. As long as the differences remain, friction will continue. Fighting will not settle conflicts. They should be settled through peaceful resolutions. A compromise between these countries is very important. If they lead to confrontation, we will suffer — many people will die and there will be so much bloodshed and it will be so costly also. Nowadays warfare is fought with money. During a public talk recently in Mcleod Ganj, you said you expect tangible actions from the US for Tibetan
Related Questions
- What is the Method of Service of Process or Documents in India from the Courts of Foreign Countries who are signatory to the Hague Convention?
- Can life insurance policies be issued to Non Resident Indians ("NRI") and Foreign nationals based in India?
- What are the advantages of trade between UK and developing countries such as India and China?
