Where does the preponderance of the evidence point?
The scientific consensus: Tens of thousands of studies published in the peer-reviewed literature and conducted by thousands of researchers over more then three decades of investigation by scientists at every kind of scientific organization (government, independent, skeptic, NGO, University, industry, etc.) all over the world have led to the overwhelming conclusion that has become the scientific consensus on climate change. The denialists: Bloggers and skeptic scientists associated with free market lobbying groups who suggest one study is enough to invalidate the preponderance of the evidence. [One red ball in a barrel somehow means the other 999 blue balls in the barrel aren’t really there.] 7) Is the claimant playing by the rules of science? The scientific consensus: Science is all about using the scientific method, assessing corraborative evidence, testing, using logic, etc. The denialists: Ignore any data that don’t support their view, including all the information presented that de