Where can I learn more about underfloor air distribution (UFAD)?
There are many resources available to lean about UFAD systems. Tate recommends finding non-biased sources when researching the performance and benefits of UFAD to conventional air distribution (CAD) systems. That’s not to say that all those who support or question UFAD are biased however both sides must be evaluated before forming a decision. Associations that are open to participation/sponsor from anyone such as ASHRAE, The Center for the Built Environment and the government supported website: Whole Building Design Guide are good examples of non-biased sources. Organizations such as SMACNA and SMWIA and the research generated through their non-profit organizations NEMI and NCEMBT should be evaluated with the knowledge that underfloor service distribution systems significantly reduce (up to 90%) the amount of sheet metal ductwork required to deliver conditioned air to an occupied space. Our recommendation when evaluating information is to always consider the source, search for alternat