When Richard Dawkins, a leading evolution scientist, cannot give rudimentary evidence for Darwin’s theory…?
Richard Dawkins is an intelligent person but he doesn’t have access to any more data than any other atheist or creationist for that matter. It’s just that he has had a lot more public exposure than many and everything he says will be examined under a microscope. That’s why he needs to “think before he speaks.” He’s been caught more than once where he had the wrong data, or he simply didn’t know the answer. I realize that no one has all of the answers, including Dawkins but the way some in R&S put him on a pedestal you would think that he was their god.
