Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

When negotiating union contracts, is it damaging to maintain a fund balance?

0
Posted

When negotiating union contracts, is it damaging to maintain a fund balance?

0

A . No. While it may appear to be a problem, a fact-finding report (November 1991) stated, “A school board should not be penalized for efficiency in operation and the development of a strong financial position by being required to grant wage increases in excess of other districts that are not as fortunate. Taxpayer money does not have to be spent just because it is available.” A final observation: In a 1991 survey, PSBA also asked school districts what percentage of their annual budgets the postponed June 3, 1991, basic subsidy payments represented. Of the nearly 200 districts responding, the average was 4.6%. Said another way, most school districts would not have been able to cover expenses normally paid by the delayed June subsidy payments if fund balances of less than 5% had been in effect.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123