Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

When modelling WFPC2 or FOC+COSTAR, why doesn Tiny Tim ask for the date of the observation, like it does for WF/PC-1 or FOC?

0
Posted

When modelling WFPC2 or FOC+COSTAR, why doesn Tiny Tim ask for the date of the observation, like it does for WF/PC-1 or FOC?

0

The date of observation was used on the aberrated cameras to determine the correct focus position due to desorption and mirror moves. Back then, desorption was significant and required frequent compensation by moving the HST secondary mirror. However, it leveled off enough by the time the repaired cameras were working that it was no longer important. The mirror is now adjusted roughly every six months. Between times of adjustment, the uncertainties in focus caused by breathing and pointing-dependent effects are greater than defocus caused by desorption.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123