Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

When Does the Full Faith and Credit Clause Require Nevada Courts to Apply California Immunity Law?

0
Posted

When Does the Full Faith and Credit Clause Require Nevada Courts to Apply California Immunity Law?

0

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt et al. Docket No. 02-42 From: Nevada Supreme Court Case at a Glance When a Nevada resident sued in the Nevada courts the California agency that enforces California’s personal income tax law, the Nevada courts declined to apply California’s immunity statute. Now the California Franchise Tax Board argues that the Full Faith and Credit Clause requires the Nevada courts to apply California immunity law, rather than Nevada law, to Gilbert P. Hyatt’s tort claims alleging intentional misconduct in Nevada against a Nevada citizens. • Previewed by Ferdinand P. Schoettle, a professor of law at the University of Minnesota Law School in Minneapolis, Minn.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123