When collecting data regarding freshman student-athletes who received athletics aid, how should the institution treat data compiled from a sport in which athletics aid is not awarded?
Use “recruited” status data in such an instance. The institution is permitted to use its own definition of “recruited,” but should be prepared to articulate that definition and explain the reasons for choosing it to the peer-review team and the committee. In doing so, an institution should note (or asterisk) places where the reported data includes the “recruited” data along with the “athletics aid” data. Institutions should note that the NCAA defines “recruited” in Bylaw 13.02.1.1 as “any solicitation of a prospect or a prospect’s relatives [or legal guardian(s)] by an institutional staff member or by a representative of the institution’s athletics interests for the purpose of securing the prospect’s enrollment and ultimate participation in the institution’s intercollegiate athletics program.” Q: How does an institution treat student-athletes who enter the institution during the preceding summer term or at mid-term as it relates to the admissions information reported for Operating Prin
Related Questions
- Do the same dual and third national restrictions apply to ITAR Controlled Data and Hardware if it is received under a DSP-5 or DSP-73 as opposed to a TAA?
- Can the foreign signatories continue to exchange amongst themselves controlled data that they have received under a TAA, after this TAA has expired?
- Ive submitted preliminary data to CPTEC. May I continue to distribute the data from my home institution?
