Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

When can a traffic signal be an asset instead of a liability to safety?

0
Posted

When can a traffic signal be an asset instead of a liability to safety?

0

– Are there so many cars on both streets that signal controls are necessary to clear up the confusion or relieve the congestion? – Is the traffic on the main street so heavy that drivers on the side street will try to cross when it is unsafe? – Are there so many pedestrians trying to cross a busy main street that confusing, congested or hazardous conditions result? – Are there so many school children trying to cross the street at the same time that they need special controls for their protection? If so, is a traffic signal the best solution? – Are signals at this location going to help drivers maintain a uniform pace along the route without stopping unnecessarily? – Does the collision history indicate that signal controls will reduce the probability of collisions? – Do two arterials intersect at this location and will a signal help improve the flow of traffic? – Is there a combination of the above conditions which indicates that a signal will be an improvement rather than a detriment?

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123