When California denies a murderer parole, should it need a reason?
Reporting from Vacaville, Calif. – During the 26 years that James Alexander has spent in prison for killing a fellow drug dealer, he has maintained a spotless behavior record and devoted himself to helping other inmates shake addictions. He’s been such a model prisoner that state parole commissioners — on three occasions — recommended that he be released. All three times, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger overruled them. Alexander, 47, is among the hundreds of so-called lifers whom state parole boards have deemed rehabilitated and ready to rejoin society, but who sit behind bars because their crime was murder. In recent years, some judges have sided with lifers, ruling that the state can’t deny an inmate parole solely because of the gravity of his original offense but rather must provide “some evidence” that he would pose a threat to public safety if released. The legal notion that corrections officials must, in essence, show that an inmate remains a threat to society is being challenged in
