Whats the different between md5, sha1, and sha256?
The difference is just the precision that the hash for each file is calculated. With the longer span of time you anticipate between re-checks of files, the higher hash function you should use. In practical terms, a md5 hash will serve fine for the production and part of post. However, as time moves forward, you should probably use a better hash function to offset any dropped bits. With archival material, you should absolutely generate sha256 sums.
Related Questions
- The MD5 Sums for My Policy/Config/Tripwire Executable Files at Installation are different than what my Latest Report tells me. How could this happen?
- Why do binary policies distributed with Fedora, such as /etc/selinux//policy/policy., and those I compile myself have different sizes and MD5 checksums?
- Whats the different between md5, sha1, and sha256?
