Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What’s the difference between standalone and fault-tolerant DFS (Distributed File System) installations?

0
Posted

What’s the difference between standalone and fault-tolerant DFS (Distributed File System) installations?

0

The standalone server stores the Dfs directory tree structure or topology locally. Thus, if a shared folder is inaccessible or if the Dfs root server is down, users are left with no link to the shared resources. A fault-tolerant root node stores the Dfs topology in the Active Directory, which is replicated to other domain controllers. Thus, redundant root nodes may include multiple connections to the same data residing in different shared folders. • We’re using the DFS fault-tolerant installation, but cannot access it from a Win98 box. Use the UNC path, not client, only 2000 and 2003 clients can access Server 2003 fault-tolerant shares. • Where exactly do fault-tolerant DFS shares store information in Active Directory? In Partition Knowledge Table, which is then replicated to other domain controllers. • Can you use Start->Search with DFS shares? Yes. • What problems can you have with DFS installed? Two users opening the redundant copies of the file at the same time, with no file-lockin

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123