Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Whats the difference between calculating the tracking error with mag(L) vs. the sensitivity function?

0
Posted

Whats the difference between calculating the tracking error with mag(L) vs. the sensitivity function?

0

Submitted by: asa Submitted on: November 29, 2004 Identifier: H7 , H8 For exact calculations of the frequency at which the error is less than a certain bound, you should use H_{er}, the sensitivity function. This gives you a measure of the error directly related to the input. The magnitude of L can be used as a quick approximation — generally, 1/(1+mag(L)) will be close to mag(1/(1+L)). However, for precise work (i.e. not approximations), you should use H_{er}. [Back to Top] • What do you mean by “If the integral is surjective (as a linear operator), then we can find an input to achieve any desired state”? Submitted by: asa Submitted on: December 6, 2004 Identifier: L5.1 Surjective is what is commonly known as “onto”. That is, if we have an operator f: X -> Y, then the image of f is all of Y. In this context, we have a linear operator (the operator, with integral, etc., that takes a system state plus input at time 0 to the system state at time T). This is an operator from the space of

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123