Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Whats the controversy about fathers rights groups?

0
0 Posted

Whats the controversy about fathers rights groups?

0
0

he article is a mixed bag. On the one hand, we have Paul Adams, who resigned as vice-chairman of ECMAS Edmonton shortly after his election in March of this year. Adams was convicted and disbarred in 1998 for approaching a 16-year-old prostitute for sex in an apparent sting operation targetting him. Obviously, this looks bad. Publicity about Adams led to the resignation from ECMAS of its Calgary executives. On the other hand, we have Ferrel Christensen, a retired academic and free speech advocate, and a long-struggling critic of the family courts. His reported sin is that he published a 1990 book containing “controversial” views on sex between minor children. Christensen seems to think that there may be serious negative effects from repressing the sexuality of minors who take an interest in sex. (I recall holding a similar opinion when I was 14 or so.) He also thinks that social reactions to precocious sexuality may be more harmful than the precocity itself. Based on the LaFramboise quo

0
10

Here’s an excerpt from an article by Gloria Woods, President of the Michigan chapter of National Organization of Women where she outlines her objection’s to father’s rights groups: “Father’s Rights” Groups: Beware Their Real Agenda “Shared Parental Responsibility.” In our work as women’s advocates, how often have we heard custodial moms wish that their children’s father would share the parental responsibility? Unfortunately, “shared parental responsibility” is the new doublespeak for joint physical custody by so-called “father’s rights” groups. For example, in Michigan proposed legislation supported by these groups would impose joint custody on parents who are in conflict over custody. Most studies report that joint custody works best when both parents want it and agree to work together. The Michigan legislation states that in a custody dispute the judge must presume that joint custody is in the “best interests of the child” and “should be ordered.” To make any other decision, a judge

0

Some say that fathers rights groups breed nothing but contempt for women and what they are trying to do.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123