Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What would constitute non-critical versus significant damage on landing as described in the rules?

0
Posted

What would constitute non-critical versus significant damage on landing as described in the rules?

0

The decision will be at the discretion of the flight line judges. In general, non-critical damage would allow the aircraft to be easily returned to safe flight status. A couple of examples of non-critical damage would be a broken propeller, bent landing gear, sheared nylon bolts or minor scratches to the finish. If any component is structurally damaged and would be considered a hazard to safe flight then it will be considered as significant damage. • Questions: Does the ten minute mission window apply to one flight attempt (chosen from Mission A, B or C) or to two different Missions flown in one uninterrupted sequence? Answer: The 10 minute window is for a single mission event (A, B or C). • Question: In the rules examples, all the times are in round minutes.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123