What would be the positive and negative impact of removing term limits from the President?
The link to the article is below the question. http://my.nowpublic.com/world/serrano-wants-term-limits-us-president-removed First, Our Constitution is not broken. The limits set out for the Presidency has worked very well since 1951. Before that there was only an “Unwritten Rule‘, started by George Washington, that no President would serve more the 2 terms. That worked up till 1940. I see no positive aspects of removing the Constitutional Term Limit imposed on the Office of the President. I see all kinds of negative results from an action of this nature. The repeal would destroy another of the Checks and Balances established in the Constitution to safeguard the Rights of the People and the States. The State have already lost there Rights and Voice, with the passage of the 17th Amendment to the Constitution. We only need to return to the Presidency of FDR to see what would happen if the 22nd Amendment was repealed. FDR was elected in 1932 just as the Free Market was reviving the stalled
