What term was declared the one millionth English word by Global Language Monitor?
Global Language Monitor uses a math formula to track new words and has deemed Web 2.0 as number one million. However Global Language Monitor in making that assertion has invited criticism from many linguists. In fact Global Language Monitor has been held up as “nonsensical.” Reuters out of Los Angeles has posted an article titled “Web 2.0 crowned one millionth English word.” This claim by Global Language Monitor has created a fairly vicious argument between the company and many in the linguistic community. Global Language Monitor with their math formula which tracks words and phrases in electronic and print media has indicated that “Web 2.0” has appeared over 25,000 times and therefore should be crowned number “one million.” Linguists are not happy with this claim. Their position is that words cannot be counted and further, there are no standardized criteria for judging a word as legitimate. Phrases, compound words and slang create further problems. Geoffrey Nunberg, a linguistics at t
Global Language Monitor uses a math formula to track new words and has deemed “Web 2.0” as number one million. However Global Language Monitor in making that assertion has invited criticism from many linguists. In fact Global Language Monitor has been held up as “nonsensical.” Global Language Monitor with their math formula which tracks words and phrases in electronic and print media has indicated that “Web 2.0” has appeared over 25,000 times and therefore should be crowned number “one million.” Linguists are not happy with this claim. Their position is that words cannot be counted and further, there are no standardized criteria for judging a word as legitimate.
Global Language Monitor uses a math formula to track new words and has deemed Web 2.0 as number one million. However Global Language Monitor in making that assertion has invited criticism from many linguists. In fact Global Language Monitor has been held up as “nonsensical.” Reuters out of Los Angeles has posted an article titled “Web 2.0 crowned one millionth English word.” This claim by Global Language Monitor has created a fairly vicious argument between the company and many in the linguistic community. Global Language Monitor with their math formula which tracks words and phrases in electronic and print media has indicated that “Web 2.0” has appeared over 25,000 times and therefore should be crowned number “one million.” Linguists are not happy with this claim. Their position is that words cannot be counted and further, there are no standardized criteria for judging a word as legitimate. Phrases, compound words and slang create further problems. Geoffrey Nunberg, a linguistics at t
Global Language Monitor uses a math formula to track new words and has deemed “Web 2.0” as number one million. However Global Language Monitor in making that assertion has invited criticism from many linguists. In fact Global Language Monitor has been held up as “nonsensical.” Global Language Monitor with their math formula which tracks words and phrases in electronic and print media has indicated that “Web 2.0” has appeared over 25,000 times and therefore should be crowned number “one million.” Linguists are not happy with this claim. Their position is that words cannot be counted and further, there are no standardized criteria for judging a word as legitimate. Sources: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1831799/global_language_monitor_weve_reached.
