what standard of proof is reasonable for public opinion to agree on the issue of harm to the Nation?
• In how many areas of the Nation’s life is evidence of harm required for public opinion to achieve agreement? • Is proof of harm necessary to make the legal case against the profession? Societies make laws to control behavior. Before specific concepts become laws they are debated and discussed. After they become laws no proof of harm is necessary on the issue of violation. For example, a motorist who drives in excess of the speed limit is guilty of violating the speed laws, regardless of whether or not any harm occurred. Thus the legal case on the issue of the unconstitutionality of the legal profession as a ‘same hands’ faction controlling all government, does not require any evidence of harm.7 However such evidence seems necessary in order for public opinion to achieve agreement on enforcement of the law. • What standard of proof is reasonable for public opinion to agree on harm? B-1 General Standards of proof in law. There are five standards of proof in use in law. They are in orde
