Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What should be the scope of hazard identification, and when is a risk analysis necessary?

0
Posted

What should be the scope of hazard identification, and when is a risk analysis necessary?

0

These questions are interrelated, as is the question of what administrative processes a country should use to determine when risk analysis is needed. No clear tool (for example, a list of specific disease agents; an administrative flow chart; or a preliminary risk assessment) has emerged as a useful method that could serve a wide range of countries or importation issues. The risk-analysis process is initiated by identifying the hazards. The first step is to prepare a complete list of pathogenic agents that could be associated with the commodity[1]. To do this, a thorough knowledge of the infectious diseases affecting the species and the commodity of concern is required. Once this list is established, it needs to be contrasted with the diseases existing in the export country. Importing countries need to determine for which diseases valid SPS measures can be established. In principle valid sanitary measures can only be established for exotic diseases and diseases which are under an offic

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123