Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What scientific evidence could disprove “Intelligent Design”?

April 26, 2017culture disprove intelligent design Religion scientific Society spirituality

0

Posted

What scientific evidence could disprove “Intelligent Design”?

5 Answers

0

Posted

you can never really disprove it because when they single out an example, the bacterial flagellum or the human immune system and say “that could not have evolved therefore it was intelligent design” and scientists then show how it did indeed evolve, they just move on to the next example and start all over again.

0

Posted

There’s nothing to disprove when it comes to intelligent design, you have no scientific evidence. Though its assertion would force us to throw out evolution, gravity, geology, astrophysics, and any modicum of intelligence we have left after that.

0

Posted

“Because if you can’t provide any, you don’t have a scientific hypothesis, do you” Which pretty much sums up Intelligent Design. Science doesn’t have to disprove ID–ID has to prove itself, and it can’t.

0

Posted

I’d have to say DNA, macro and micro evolution and you know, the lack of any proof that an “intelligent designer” exists are fairly strong evidence against intelligent design.

0

Posted

A hypothesis to disprove anything is rarely required. See argument from conservatism, scientific method, Occam’s Razor.