Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What other design alternatives were considered during the 1990s review process?

0
Posted

What other design alternatives were considered during the 1990s review process?

0

In early 1996, the project’s Technical Advisory Committee and Community Advisory Committee reviewed thirteen concepts. In May 1996, Washington County held an Open House to hear comments from the public. The concepts reviewed are listed below. Note that because some alternatives advanced for further analysis represented general categories and contained elements of non-selected alternatives, the total listed is greater than thirteen. The five alternative concepts below were advanced for further review: • Alternative #1: No action (no build) • Alternative #2: Transportation System Management (TSM) – Relatively low cost, low impact improvements would be implemented to extend the operating life of the intersection, such as: improved traffic signals, improved lane location and striping, and improved traffic signs. • Alternative #3: Split Intersection – This alternative would provide for greater separation between the Scholls Ferry Rd and Oleson Road intersections with Beaverton-Hillsdale Hig

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123