What must Intel do to comply with EU law?
The Decision sets out how Intel has breached EU antitrust law by engaging in two types of practices which have harmed competition. First, Intel gave wholly or partially hidden rebates to computer manufacturers on condition that they bought all, or almost all, their x86 central processing units (CPUs) from Intel. Intel also made direct payments to a major retailer on condition it stock only computers with Intel x86 CPUs. Second, Intel made direct payments to computer manufacturers to halt or delay the launch of specific products containing a competitor’s x86 CPUs and to limit the sales channels available to these products. Intel is obliged desist from the specific practices identified in this case and not to engage in these or equivalent practices in the future. What is the geographic scope of the remedy? This is a worldwide market. Within this context, Intel is obliged not to engage in any abusive practices that have an effect within the European Economic Area (EEA). How will this Deci
Related Questions
- Are there any special requirements for insurers’ filings to comply with Ohio’s Mental Health Parity law and the Wellstone-Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act?
- If a recipient is covered by a state or local "English-only" law, must it still comply with the Title VI obligation and agency guidance interpreting that obligation?
- What will businesses need to do to comply with the no smoking law?
