What led to the NomCom making the final selections so that they need no further ratification or approval?
In 2002, ICANN underwent a reformation process involving extensive discussions throughout the ICANN community. The overall structure that came out of this process is described in ICANN: Blueprint for Reform (posted 20 June 2002) and the Final Implementation and Recommendations of the Committee on ICANN Evolution and Reform (posted 2 October 2002). These documents called for formation of a Nominating Committee to select individuals to serve on key ICANN bodies. The latter report included the proposed Bylaws for implementing the recommendations. The Bylaws that were approved at the Amsterdam ICANN meeting on 15 December 2002 assign to the Nominating Committee the responsibility for selections of all ICANN Directors except the President and those Directors selected by ICANNs Supporting Organizations, and for such other selections as are set forth in the Bylaws. [Article VII, Section 1] The Nominating Committee’s responsibility for selection of three members of the GNSO Council is set fort
Related Questions
- Our organization requires review of all research projects by our Institutional Review Board (IRB). Do we need to secure final IRB approval for the proposal process?
- What led to the NomCom making the final selections so that they need no further ratification or approval?
- Who has final approval authority for banding decisions?
