What justification can be made for not disclosing what comments drew fines?
As I said earlier, I believe NASCAR hoped that by leaving drivers in the dark, they would force the drivers to take a “better safe than sorry” approach, which would curtail all negative comments. By telling drivers exactly what was said, it gives them a little more confidence to push the envelope. The fines also shine a little more light on the fact that a lot of the non-technical actions that draw fines and penalties are subject to interpretation, which I’m sure is something NASCAR wants to downplay (remember what I said about credibility and protecting the brand earlier).
Related Questions
- At this April meeting when the justification was made why a new book was needed, was there any discussion of the contents or substance of the biology book on the subject of evolution?
- How many negative comments can a person have before ebay will suspend them?
- Why aren negative comments from suspended users changed to neutrals?
What justification can be made for not disclosing what comments drew fines?