Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is the technical difference between regular lenses and macro lenses? What are their pros and cons in close-up photography?

0
Posted

What is the technical difference between regular lenses and macro lenses? What are their pros and cons in close-up photography?

0

A.: The true macro lenses are single focal length lenses corrected for a flat field, a high resolution and low distortion at close distances. Some macro lenses can produce life-size images without extension tubes. Cons: Expensive. In New York the prices are: Nikon 105 mm/2.8 $650, Canon 100mm/2.8 $580, Minolta 100mm/2,8 $600. Macro lenses made by independent manufactures are more reasonably priced. Both the Sigma 105/2,8 $389 and the Tamron 90/2.8 $400 are very good. Some zoom lenses can provide a 1:2 life-size at a lower cost. Their optical performance is adequate for nature photography but not for copy work requiring a flat field and a low distortion. A close-up lens and an extension tube (for single focal length lenses only) are low cost options to be considered. Erik ekissa@aol.com Another e-mail question was sent from a Club member to Bob Coffey.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123