What is the States position with respect to the report issued by Avi Rubin and the risk assessment performed by Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)?
The report issued by Avi Rubin and his colleagues made incorrect assumptions. While Mr. Rubin and his colleagues are computer experts, they are not election experts and, as a result, failed to consider the laws, processes, and election officials that surround the election process and protect the integrity of your vote. The Diebold AccuVote-TS voting unit is a stand-alone unit and IS NEVER connected to the Internet. The Diebold AccuVote-TS voting unit does NOT have a curtain; while side screens provide the voter with privacy while casting his/her vote, the voter is observed at all times by election judges from different political parties. The Diebold AccuVote-TS unit has a public counter that records the number of votes cast on the unit, and throughout the Election Day, this number is compared to the number of voters who showed up at the polling place to vote. Any discrepancy would be identified. In order to affect election results, multiple people in the election preparation process (o
Related Questions
- What is the States position with respect to the report issued by Avi Rubin and the risk assessment performed by Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)?
- What is the States position with respect to the report issued by Avi Rubin and the risk assessment performed by Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)?
- How will the risk assessment report be protected against discovery in legal action?
