What is the significance of our comparison with peer institutions in terms of the quality of education at The University of Texas at Austin?
State appropriations plus tuition and fees and charges support the core academic enterprise of public higher education. UT Austin s ability to compete with national leaders, that is the University s ability to offer Texas and Texans educational programs and knowledge-based services equivalent to the best available in other states, rests upon financial resources similar to those available in other leading public institutions. In Texas, about 90 percent of students in higher education are enrolled in public institutions, so Texas relies heavily on its public universities to provide students with access to nationally competitive programs. A sound financial base from appropriations, tuition and fees and charges is required if UT (a) is to draw and retain top talent among its faculty and staff, (b) is to establish and maintain necessary facilities, (c) is to achieve a student/faculty ratio characteristic of nationally leading public universities, and (d) is to become a force in emerging are
Related Questions
- In general terms, under this planning scenario, how would a reduction of this magnitude impact the quality of education, economic impact and operation at Georgia Tech?
- How does GW compare with peer institutions in terms of alumni participation and fundraising?
- What is the GPA need to get into University of Texas at Austin?
