What is the rational of the Newburgh v. Arrigo holding?
The underlying rational of the Newburgh v. Arrigo decision is that if society does not mandate the duty of parents to pay for their children’s college costs, then the number of children who go on to high education will decrease. Moreover, society will suffer if fewer children receive a college education. My personal view is that both parents, whether married or divorced, have a moral duty to contribute to college if they are financially able to do so. The citizens and parents of New Jersey’s children have an obligation to contribute to their college if they are financially able to do so. New Jersey has a vested interest to encourage children who want to go to college. If they have the academic ability, then children should be able to attend college without assuming staggering student loans, if their families can afford to help out. There is no doubt that New Jersey is one of the most liberal states with regard to child support, and requiring parents to pay for their children’s college
The underlying rational of the Newburgh v. Arrigo decision is that if society does not mandate the duty of parents to pay for their children’s college costs, then the number of children who go on to higher education will decrease. Moreover, society will suffer if fewer children receive a college education. My personal view is that both parents, whether married or divorced, have a moral duty to contribute to college if they are financially able to do so. The citizens and parents of New Jersey’s children have an obligation to contribute to their college costs if they are financially able to do so. New Jersey has a vested interest to encourage children who want to go to college. If they have the academic ability, then children should be able to attend college without assuming staggering student loans, if their families can afford to help out. There is no doubt that New Jersey is one of the most liberal states with regard to child support and requiring parents to pay for their children’s c
The underlying rational of the Newburgh v. Arrigo decision is that if society does not mandate the duty of parents to pay for their children’s college costs, then the number of children who go on to high education will decrease. Moreover, society will suffer if less children receive a college education. My personal view is that both parents, whether married or divorced, have a moral duty to contribute to college if they are financially able to do so. The citizens and parents of New Jersey’s children have an obligation to contribute to their college if they are financially able to do so. New Jersey has a vested interest to encourage children who want to go to college. If they have the academic ability, then children should be able to attend college without assuming staggering student loans, if their families can afford to help out. There is no doubt that New Jersey is one of the most liberal states with regard to child support, and requiring parents to pay for their children’s college c
The underlying rational of the Newburgh v. Arrigo decision is that if society does not mandate the duty of parents to pay for their children’s college costs, then the number of children who go on to high education will decrease. Moreover, society will suffer if less children receive a college education. My personal view is that both parents, whether married or divorced, have a moral duty to contribute to college if they are financially able to do so. The citizens and parents of New Jersey’s children have an obligation to contribute to their college if they are financially able to do so. New Jersey has a vested interest to encourage children who want to go to college. If they have the academic ability, then children should be able to attend college without assuming staggering student loans, if their families can afford to help out. There is no doubt that New Jersey is one of the most liberal states with regard to child support, and requiring parents to pay for their children’s college c
