What is the process by which dossiers are reviewed, how long does it take, and who does it?
The process is summarized in the Delegation of Authority Chart for each title series. • Department: Once the dossier has been assembled it is reviewed within the department. A Peer Group will review the file and provide evaluative comments to the voting members of the department (i.e., the Voting Group). The latter will review the entire file, including the Peer Group comments and vote on the action. For those Professional Researchers with teaching responsibilities: AS and AF votes are tallied separately and reported in two separate department letters (However, only one letter needs to include a detailed evaluation/discussion about the candidate’s performance unless the views of the AS and AF voters differ). In addition, the chair may include comments from the peer group review. The complete dossier is then forwarded to the dean. • Dean/Associate Dean: If advancement is a redelegated action, the Dean’s Office sends all of the materials to the JPC for review and recommendation. The dean
Related Questions
- I submitted a request and have reviewed the Request Details, Activity Log, and Process View from the Request Entry console. How do I get more information regarding my request?
- What is the process by which dossiers are reviewed, how long does it take, and who does it?
- What is the process for the proposed transmission to be reviewed and approved?
