Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is the non-parametric version of two-way ANOVA?

0
Posted

What is the non-parametric version of two-way ANOVA?

0

I am a little rusty on this, but I seem to recall that for these kinds of 2×2 designs with non-parametric data the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test is the way to go. If you’re cramming this into a 2×2 table then you must be stratifying the dependent results (# of errors on visual testing) into PassVisualTest and FailVisualTest categories. This may not be the best way to go about this. The (Wilcoxon)-Mann-Whitney U test is a special or degenerate case of this test so it may also be appropriate. It’s worth knowing that you have to have a pretty large sample size for either of these tests to have a decent chance of detecting a significant result. If any of the 2×2 cells contain less than 5 subjects, the chi-square test is likely to produce a type II error (failure to detect a true difference between the groups); the Mann-Whitney test likewise requires a fairly large sample, 50-100 or so in each wing to detect reasonable differences. I would strongly caution you about transforming data to f

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123