What is the main difference between the EU settlement procedure and the US plea bargaining agreements?
Under the US system, a company or individual admits an infringement and accepts a sanction in the course of a negotiation process that results in an agreement to make a plea before a judge and to waive their right to appeal. Unlike US settlements, which are also an investigative tool, the EU settlement procedure is not used to gather evidence, but rather as a tool to simplify the procedure and make better use of the Commission’s resources. The Commission’s settlement decisions may still be appealed to the EU Courts.
Related Questions
- Why do collective bargaining agreements contain a grievance procedure? Why does the grievance procedure end in binding arbitration?
- What is the main difference in the procedure for slumping glass in ceramic and stainless steel molds?
- What is the main difference between Project Standard and Project Pro?